incub3.org

Talk about cutthroat competition. Chinese Social networking behemoth and shameless facebook clone Xiaonei.com was accused of attacking direct competitor and equally shameless facebook clone Tongxue.com. Tongxue released a press statement (in Chinese) decrying the cyber attack as irresponsible and urging competitors to exhibit mutual respect.

Its interesting to think about the Chinese Social-Networking-Service (SNS) space. SNS remains very much a college-oriented, and white collar worker space. Also, more than their English-speaking peers, Chinese web users enjoy an integrated SNS. For example, Tongxue offers streaming radio from many terrestial Chinese stations as well as video. The coming showdown between Xiaonei and Tongxue is sure to be a clash of the titans to be watched closely. Which service will be able to move away from its roots as a facebook clone and customize its user experience to suit the preferences of Chinese users more quickly?

In this struggle for supremacy, Xiaonei is the clear leader at present. Xiaonei justifies its previous 550 million USD funding round by having 22 million users from over 3000 Chinese universities and over 1500 foreign universities. Such is the optimism surrounding Xiaonei that there is already talk of going public. Tongxue on the other hand has recently just secured 2.2 million in funding from Tano Capital LLC, in recognition of the vast expansion potential for Chinese SNS.

The insular nature of the Chinese internet sphere, due to language barriers and also the Great Firewall of China, effectively protects Chinese web start-ups from their English language counterparts. Watching the Chinese internet sphere is almost like watching the internet grow anew. Watch this space for more updates.

Social entrepreneurs don’t get enough respect. There’s nothing wrong with running a non-profit halfway house for recovering drug addicts or providing vocational training to ex-convicts to assimilate them back into society. Its just that, among other things, these ventures are neither profitable nor exciting.

Of course, there’s no reason that this should remain true. The Economist has an article in one of its January issues describing a new, promising, fun, AND profitable business model for social entrepreneurship. Too good to be true? Read and find out.

I’m sure Virgance’s website has caught the eye of many an unemployed graduate. Now that I’ve got your attention, Virgance‘s website proudly proclaims its model as “Activism 2.0″. There are some truly amazing ideas coming from the brains of the entrepreneurial activists/activist entrepreneurs at Virgance. Aside from the the groundbreaking 1BOG and Carrotmob ideas already covered in the Economist article, Virgance is also working on a program called Lend Me Some Sugar that will allow muti-national firms to let their customers become involved in their corporate philantropy. Through Lend Me Some Sugar, customers can direct the philantropy efforts of the companies they support, letting customers and companies partner each other in doing good for society.

Virgance is only the tip of the new activism. “IfWeRanTheWorld” takes crowdsourcing (the idea of utilizing the power of crowds to achieve goals) and plunks it down in the middle of many intractable social problems we have today. It is still in the early planning stages (there isn’t even a website yet), but the idea is a remarkable one. Led by marketing veteran Cindy Gallop and software developer and serial entrepreneur Wendell Davi, IfWeRanTheWorld seeks to break down large social projects into small discrete parts that can be picked up by users to complete, and hence a great number of people can contribute to a massive project’s success, which could not have been achieved without massive effort otherwise. Both these ideas could become huge, in large part because they are profit-driven companies. The difference is that they don’t derive profits from the money going towards the project directly. Both expect a large part of revenues to come from advertising. Digital guru Esther Dyson has said that IfWeRanTheWorld could create a “liquidity of goodness”. I certainly can’t argue against that.

reposted from Northisup

Twitter may be shiny and new, but its finances are reminiscent of the dark age of the dot-com bust. With no revenue or business plan, Twitter is still subsisting on investor capital. Before you think that Twitter is going the way of the web-based dodo, note that VC firms Benchmark Capital and IVP recently pumped $35 million into Twitter and Facebook bid $500 million of its stock for Twitter, reflecting rock solid investor confidence.

So confident is Twitter of its future that it organized its inaugural Shorty Awards in New York recently, honouring remarkable twitterers in categories as varied as food and videogames. People are finding remarkable uses for Twitter beyond its already amazing social value, including controlling home appliances and monitoring your home’s security. There is an excellent chance that some of these uses will ultimately become profitable. Even without these alternative uses, Twitter is already generating ad revenue in Japan, and getting fans from the American Congress and Israeli Consulate. Will we see Twitter bidding for government contracts to disseminate information in the future? Don’t bet against it.